FIFA President Addresses Whether Cartel Violence in Mexico Will Affec… — and more

NEED TO KNOW

• After increased violence at the hands of local cartels in Mexico, there were some concerns about if the 2026 FIFA World Cup games in the country would continue as scheduled
• The organization's president Gianni Infantino expressed faith in the country during a press conference on Feb. 24
• While the United States increased security warnings for citizens in Mexico, a shelter-in-place warning was officially called off on Feb. 25

Amid concerns about the current state of affairs in Mexico, organizers are prepared to move forward with this summer's 2026 FIFA World Cup games scheduled to take place across three Mexican cities.

Mexico will co-host the annual soccer competition with the United States and Canada. Planning has been ongoing since the destinations were first announced in 2018. Games in Mexico are taking place in Guadalajara, Monterrey and Mexico City.

However, there have been worries about the safety of the games due to increased tensions with local cartels following the Sunday, Feb. 22, action that the Mexican government took against the criminal drug cartel group Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG).

According to a press release from the Ministry of National Defense, the cartel's leader, Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera Cervantes, died in the operation.

His death led to retaliatory action across Mexico, with at least 70 people dying in the resulting violence, The Associated Press reported.

The United States Embassy and Consulates in Mexico issued a shelter-in-place warning on Feb. 22, which was formally lifted on Wednesday, Feb. 25.

Despite signs that the violence is easing, some have expressed concerns about whether the games in Mexico would be able to proceed.

At a press conference on Tuesday, Feb. 24, FIFA's president Gianni Infantino said that there were no plans to reschedule or move the games at this time.

“Of course, we are monitoring the situation in Mexico these days, but I want to say from the outset that we have complete confidence in Mexico, in its president, Claudia Sheinbaum, and in the authorities, and we are convinced that everything will go as smoothly as possible,” he said while delivering remarks in Colombia, via AP.

Infantino praised Mexico as "a great country," adding, "things happen."

“That’s why we have governments, police, and authorities who will ensure order and security," he said.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Thirteen games during the World Cup will take place in Mexico, starting with a face-off between Mexico and South Africa on June 11, according to the official FIFA schedule.

The president of the Colombian Soccer Federation, Ramón Jesurún, expressed confidence in the ability for the games to move ahead as planned, saying that the organization "[knows] they will overcome this and move forward."

Other nations have expressed more reservations.

Michael Ricketts, the president of the Jamaican Soccer Federation, told AP that they'd be monitoring the situation in Mexico leading up to an intercontinental playoff semifinal scheduled there in March.

“We will be listening out for CONCACAF and FIFA to give us instructions [on] whether they are playing the games or whether they are immediately looking for other options," Ricketts said.

A day prior to Infantino's Tuesday press conference, The Athletic reported that the organization was "gripped by worry," citing an anonymous insider. The outlet reported that the internal feelings changed as the day went on.

By Monday, Feb. 23, a spokesperson told The Athletic that there was "full confidence" in the host countries.

“At FIFA Mexico, we are closely monitoring the situation in Jalisco and remain in constant communication with the authorities,” the spokesperson said. “We will continue to follow the actions and directions from the different government agencies, aimed at maintaining public safety and restoring normalcy, and we reiterate our close collaboration with federal, state, and local authorities.”

While FIFA opted out of commenting on "hypotheticals and speculation" about whether the games would be canceled, the spokesperson praised Mexico for "approaching World Cup planning as a matter of national security and national pride," saying that the country has "resourced the planning accordingly."

FIFA did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's for comment on how they will proceed with the 2026 World Cup.

Read the original article on People

The NCAA football oversight committee is recommending emergency legislation to protect the transfer portal window by issuing penalties for schools and coaches who circumvent the rules. The committee on Wednesday proposed the legislation to penalize schools who add players who did not make public their interest in transferring during the January transfer portal window. The proposed legislation would become effective immediately if approved at the Division I cabinet meeting in April. Among the proposed penalties, the head coach who accepts a transfer who did not properly enter the January portal would be prohibited from all recruiting, on-field coaching and team meetings for six games. The school accepting the transfer would be fined 20% of its football budget. Also, the school would lose five roster spots for the following season, even if the coach who accepted the transfer is no longer employed. Georgia athletic director Josh Brooks said it is important to enforce the transfer portal window rule. "Attempts to circumvent the transfer window process is an issue for the sport," Brooks said in a statement released by the NCAA. "We want to let everyone know that this is not going to be allowed, and the committee wants to protect the transfer window that has been established." Buffalo athletic director Mark Alnutt, the chair of the oversight committee, said "significant penalties" are needed to enforce the transfer rule. "We felt this was appropriate to place an emphasis on this rule with where we are in Division I football," Alnutt said. "We have a window for student-athletes to notify their school when they would like to enter the transfer portal. If there is movement without going through the process as it is legislated, the committee felt there needed to be significant penalties." The committee also voted to eliminate the annual limit on official recruiting visits. The transfer rule and compensation for players through name, image and likeness contracts have created other issues. The University of Cincinnati is suing its former quarterback, Brendan Sorsby, following his transfer to Texas Tech. Cincinnati is accusing Sorsby of breaching his NIL contract, which the school says was signed in July 2025 to cover the 2025 and 2026 seasons. Cincinnati says the contract included a $1 million buyout if Sorsby transferred. Sorsby received the most lucrative deal of the portal period — a reported $5 million — to return to his home state for his final season. NCAA rules panel proposes ejection, uniform changes Division I football rules makers have proposed a one-year trial rule allowing a player disqualified for targeting for the first time to play in his team's next game regardless of which half the penalty was assessed, the NCAA announced Thursday. Currently, players disqualified for targeting must miss the rest of the game and, if the penalty occurs in the second half, sit out the first half of the next game. Under the Division I Football Rules Subcommittee's proposal, a player disqualified for targeting a second time during the season would miss the first half of the next game. A third targeting ejection in the same season would cause the offending player to miss the entire next game. Targeting is forcible contact with an opponent's head or neck area where the offending player often uses the crown of his helmet to make contact or launches his body into the opposing player above the shoulders. Oversight committees for the Bowl Subdivision and Championship Subdivision must approve proposals before they become official. Those committees meet next month. "This continues the evolution of our targeting rule and balances the important safety impact with an appropriate penalty structure," said A.J. Edds, rules subcommittee chair and vice president of football administration for the Big Ten. "We will closely monitor this one-year adjustment, and the committee believes it is important to enhance the progressive penalty to ensure proper coaching and player education." The rules subcommittee proposed that players wear leg coverings from the top of their shoes to the bottom of their pants. Players would have to wear the same covering style and colors for that particular game. Players out of compliance with the rule would have to leave the game for at least one down and correct the issue. A team would receive a warning for the first offense. If a team has a second offense under this proposal, the offending team would be given a 5-yard penalty. Any subsequent violations of the rule would result in a 15-yard penalty. "The current look of the uniform is clearly not meeting the expectations of the college football community," Edds said. "This will take a collective effort by administrators, coaches and officials to communicate expectations to players and equipment managers. This proposal, we believe, is definitive and gives us a chance for consistent enforcement across Division I football." Under a proposal, a team could choose to attempt a fair catch kick after a completed or awarded fair catch. The kick would be a field goal place kick with a holder or a drop kick from the spot where the returner caught the ball. The defense would be at least 10 yards from the spot of the kick. If the ensuing kick goes through the uprights, it would be worth three points. Subcommittee members believe adding the rule would align Division I rules with those in the NFL and high school football. The rarely used play came up in 2024 in the NFL when the Los Angeles Chargers' Cameron Dicker converted from 57 yards against the Denver Broncos. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

The Dallas Cowboys have reportedly gotten into multiple heated arguments with agents of free agents at the NFL Combine and that's bad news for Dallas bid to sign and re-sign players this offseason.